Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ptsldigital.ukm.my/jspui/handle/123456789/784105
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorTrevor A. Wilkins-
dc.contributor.authorWai-Ming Mok-
dc.date.accessioned2026-07-15T05:48:45Z-
dc.date.available2026-07-15T05:48:45Z-
dc.identifier.urihttps://ptsldigital.ukm.my/jspui/handle/123456789/784105-
dc.description.abstractThis paper analyses Australian lessee firms' discretionary finance lease accounting policy choice during the first year of the transitional provisions permitted by AAS 17. Economic factors are examined in an attempt to explain managements' choice of a lease capitalization or footnote disclosure only accounting method. Contrary to U.S. evidence, the empirical results are mixed. The empirical evidence indicates that leverage, interest coverage, increase in profits, and increase in interest coverage influence managements' choice of lease accounting method. However, profits, increase in leverage, size, industry, and audit firm do not appear to influence the that managers make accounting policy choice. These results indicate near term profits and decisions aimed at maximising capitalization.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.subjectLease accountingen_US
dc.subjectAustraliaen_US
dc.titleAn analysis of lease accounting and disclosures by Australian firms subsequent to AAS17en_US
dc.typeSeminar Papersen_US
dc.format.pages84en_US
dc.identifier.callnoHC681.P338 1990 katsemen_US
dc.contributor.conferencenamePacific-Basin Finance Conference-
dc.coverage.conferencelocationBangkok, Thailand-
dc.date.conferencedate1990-06-04-
Appears in Collections:Seminar Papers/ Proceedings / Kertas Kerja Seminar/ Prosiding

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.