Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ptsldigital.ukm.my/jspui/handle/123456789/520578
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorLam, K.-
dc.contributor.authorChang, E.-
dc.contributor.authorLee, M.C.-
dc.date.accessioned2023-10-19T03:38:22Z-
dc.date.available2023-10-19T03:38:22Z-
dc.identifier.urihttps://ptsldigital.ukm.my/jspui/handle/123456789/520578-
dc.description.abstractIn this paper, we test the 2-parameter symmetric variance gamma option pricing model and the 3-parameter asymmetric variance gamma option pricing model empirically. Prices of the Hang Seng Index call options which are of European style are used as the data for the empirical test. Since the VG option pricing model is developed for the pricing of European options, the empirical test gives a more conclusive answer than previous papers which used American option data to the applicability of the VG models. The present study uses a large number of intraday option data which span over a period of three years. Synchronous option and futures data are used throughout the study. Pairwise comparison between the accuracy of model prices are carried out using both parametric and non-parametric methods. When historical data are used to estimate model parameters based on which model prices are produced, the model pricing error is found to be much less for the VG models than for the Black-Scholes model. Between the symmetric VG and the asymmetric VG, the latter is found to have less error bias but have a larger standard deviation in error. Non-parametric test shows that the asymmetric VG fares better than the symmetric VG in option pricing. Thus, although the mean absolute error or mean squared error is less for SVG than for A VG, the reverse is true if some outlying A VG errors are discounted. As in Madan, Carr and Chang (1998) we show that the superior performance of the VG model is reflected in regression tests conducted on pricing errors. The results show that while the moneyness and maturity biases are prominent in the Black-Scholes model, the VG models, either symmetric or asymmetric, are relatively free of these errors. When model parameters are implied by a number of previously traded option prices, the model pricing error is also less for the VG models than for the Black-Scholes model, although the improvement is much less than is observed in the historical approach. The conclusion is that the VG models are useful models for option pricing and can produce model prices which approximate observed market prices better than the Black-Scholes approach.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.subjectSymmetric variance gammaen_US
dc.subjectHang Seng Indexen_US
dc.subjectFutures marketen_US
dc.subjectEmpirical testen_US
dc.titleAn empirical test of the variance gamma option pricing modelen_US
dc.typeSeminar Papersen_US
dc.format.pages70en_US
dc.identifier.callnoHG4026.A536 2001 katsemen_US
dc.contributor.conferencenameThe thirteenth Annual PACAP/FMA Finance Conference-
dc.coverage.conferencelocationWestin Chosun Hotel, Seoul, Korea-
dc.coverage.conferencelocationRadisson Plaza Hotel, Seoul, Korea-
dc.date.conferencedate2001-07-05-
Appears in Collections:Seminar Papers/ Proceedings / Kertas Kerja Seminar/ Prosiding

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.