1. UKM Learning and Research Repository
2. PHD Thesis / Tesis PHD
3. Faculty of Islamic Studies / Fakulti Pengajian Islam

Title:	Viewpoints of commentators of al-Bukhari and contemporary Salafist in Islamic creed
Authors:	Mohammed Abdulhameed Sleibi (P77615)
Supervisor:	Abdull Rahman Mahmood, Dr.
Keywords:	Salafist Islam -- Doctrines -- 21st century
Issue Date:	2017
Description:	One of the most important advanced annotations which dealt with al-Bukhari and received by the nation's acceptance; al-Kawakib al-Darari by Kirmani, Fath al-Bari by al-'Asqalani, 'Umdat al-Qari by 'Aini, and Irsyad al-Sari by Qustalani, have been drawn criticism and responses to their point of views in Islamic creed by the contemporary Salafist, like Ibn Baz, Al-Rajahi, Al-Barrak, Al-Ghaniman and considered that the views contradict with the nation's predecessor, but it is for the people of aberration, contrary and astray, due to the ignorance of many people with the methodology of commentators and the spread of Salafist methodology in the Islamic countries, which has led to the emergence of many problems, including: the emergence of takfiri groups, innovate, stray, blaspheme, and stabbing, and underestimate the prominent scholars. The study aims to explain both methodologies in Islamic creed, and problems solving from the spread of Salafism methodology in Islamic countries. The study used the methodology of extrapolating the texts which dealt with the subject, analytical, critical and comparative approaches. The study found that the methodology of commentators are tally with the views of the Sunnis; al-Ash'aris and al-Maturidis, while the method of Salafist rely mainly on the statements of Ibn Taymiyyah and Ibn al-Qayyim. The methodology of the commentators in the beliefs are based on a combination and compromise between the views, and the dispute in which verbal, while the Salafist claim that the beliefs are one truth, and the characters of commentators methodology has varied between authority, interpretation and firm of the evidence, and the Salafist has demonstrated all the characters for what they are, and in fate and destiny favored which commentators gain theory; but the Salafist said otherwise, and in a matter of seeing God, the commentators firm that seeing the Prophet (PBUH) to his Lord in the throne, while the Salafist claim without seeing in it. In the issue of prophecies, the commentators have agreed with the definition of the majority of scholars on the Prophet and the Messengers, while the Salafist contradict in it. The issue of reconstruction of prophet Khidr (PBUH), the commentators agreed with it while the Salafist claim with his death. This research contributes to the unity of the nation and renounce their sub-differences especially in the contemporary era, by putting the solutions to those problems.,Certification of Master's/Doctoral Thesis" is not available
Pages:	386
Call Number:	BP165.5.S566 2017 tesis
Publisher:	UKM, Bangi
Appears in Collections:	Faculty of Islamic Studies / Fakulti Pengajian Islam

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.