Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ptsldigital.ukm.my/jspui/handle/123456789/390174
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorAhmad Martadha Mohammad-
dc.date.accessioned2023-04-06T01:53:48Z-
dc.date.available2023-04-06T01:53:48Z-
dc.identifier.urihttps://ptsldigital.ukm.my/jspui/handle/123456789/390174-
dc.description.abstractThere is a rising concern that the traditional mechanisms used to ensure bureaucratic Efficiency and accountability of public service have been eroded as a result of organizational structuring, complexities of governmental structure, and a blurry distinction between politics and administration. Bureaucracy has now become a focal point of criticism not only for its extensive power but also for its waste and mismanagement of resources, its obscurity in decision-making process, and its insulation from political control. Public outcry about inefficiency, red taped, detailed rules and regulations, and impersonalization of treatment bear the testimony of the growing distance between the people and bureaucratic organizations. The author argues that classical and contemporary models of accountability and theoretically and empirically inadequate to provide a justifiable framework that could ensure the attainment of bureaucratic and democratic accountability at the same time. In postulating this argument the author will rely heavily upon qualitative analysis of the relevant literature. "Administrative action in any political system, but especially in democracy, must somehow realize two objectives simultaneously. It is necessary to construct and maintain administrative capacity, and it is equally necessary 10 control it in order to ensure the responsiveness of the public bureaucracy to higher authority. " (Garvey, 1995)en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherFaculty of Business, Economics and Policy Studies, Universiti Brunei Darussalam; Civil Service Institute, Prime Minister's Officeen_US
dc.subjectBureaucracyen_US
dc.subjectAccountabilityen_US
dc.subjectPublic serviceen_US
dc.titleBureaucratic efficiency and democratic accountability : conflict or compatibilityen_US
dc.typeSeminar Papersen_US
dc.format.pages1-20en_US
dc.identifier.callnoJA35.5.I57 2002 semen_US
dc.contributor.conferencenameInternational Conference on Good Governance : Perspective and Practices-
dc.coverage.conferencelocationBrunei Darussalam-
dc.date.conferencedate2002-09-28-
Appears in Collections:Seminar Papers/ Proceedings / Kertas Kerja Seminar/ Prosiding

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.