Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ptsldigital.ukm.my/jspui/handle/123456789/515816
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.advisorNoor Hassim Ismail, Prof. Dr.
dc.contributor.authorTam Jenn Zhueng (P57094)
dc.date.accessioned2023-10-16T09:31:19Z-
dc.date.available2023-10-16T09:31:19Z-
dc.date.issued2014-03-04
dc.identifier.otherukmvital:80282
dc.identifier.urihttps://ptsldigital.ukm.my/jspui/handle/123456789/515816-
dc.descriptionWork- relatedness decision of disabling chronic back pain interestingly is a collective assessment between ergonomists and occupational physicians which involved variable standards and measurement rendering subjective outcomes that should be based on local population and standards. Therefore, a questionnaire based tool is designed and subjected to four phases of reliability and validity tests in determining work- relatedness. Phase I of the study involved a systemic review that was performed in 2011 to identify variables and constructs that had strong scientific evidence that could be chosen into the questionnaire. Next, a qualitative study among experts and workers with chronic back pain was conducted in Phase II during questionnaire translation phase. Then, a pre- test study or Phase III was performed to examine its potential in achieving its objectives in 2012 for 6 months to develop a regression relationship based on SOCSO Medical Board decision outcomes. In Phase III, Likert scores with high physical demand, low psychological demand, colleagues who complain of similar back pain, job task involved in twisting for more than 20o, young employees and employees that reported high Pain Visual Analog Scores were associated with occupational back pain. The criterion validity reported sensitivity of 90.9% and specificity of 95.5%. Reliability and validity of the BACKS Tool was tested in Phase IV whereby a sensitivity of 62.7%, specificity of 94.5%, positive- predictive value (PPV) of 92.9%, negative- predictive value (NPV) of 69.0% and positive likelihood ratio (+LR) of 11.4 according to the standards of the Medical Board of SOCSO was reported. The degree of agreement between BACKS Tool with SOCSO Medical Board was high. In conclusion, BACKS Tool served as a complementary occupational back pain assessment along with qualitative studies such as workplace visits or assessments that would provide quick, objective and structured assessment for occupational physicians at the clinical setting as the industrial world enters into the uncertain global recession.,PhD
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherUKM, Kuala Lumpur
dc.relationFaculty of Medicine / Fakulti Perubatan
dc.rightsUKM
dc.subjectChronic back pain
dc.subjectEmployees
dc.subjectPublic health
dc.titleBacks-tool to discriminate work-related chronic back pain among employees
dc.typeTheses
dc.format.pages237
dc.identifier.callnotesis WA20.5.T153b 2014 9HUKM
dc.identifier.barcode001189
Appears in Collections:Faculty of Medicine / Fakulti Perubatan

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
ukmvital_80282+SOURCE1+SOURCE1.0.PDF
  Restricted Access
5.04 MBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.