1. UKM Learning and Research Repository
  2. Journal Article / Artikel Jurnal
  3. Journal Content Pages/ Kandungan Halaman Jurnal
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ptsldigital.ukm.my/jspui/handle/123456789/578863
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorChristina Ong Sook Beng (UTAR)
dc.contributor.authorYuen Chee Keong (UKM)
dc.date.accessioned2023-11-06T03:09:14Z-
dc.date.available2023-11-06T03:09:14Z-
dc.date.issued2017-03
dc.identifier.issn0128-7702
dc.identifier.otherukmvital:84496
dc.identifier.urihttps://ptsldigital.ukm.my/jspui/handle/123456789/578863-
dc.descriptionThis study aims at identifying the structural and functional types of lexical bundles (LBs) used in the reading passages of Malaysian University English Test (MUET). A specialised corpus of MUET reading passages was built. The passages were categorised into five main disciplines namely Applied Science, Pure Science, Business, Humanities and Social Science. Using WordSmith Tools version 5, the lists of frequently occurring LBs in all the five disciplines were generated. They were then sorted according to Biber, Conrad and Cortes’ (2004) Structural Taxonomy and Hyland’s (2008) Functional Taxonomy. Chisquare test and Fisher’s exact test were adopted to determine the association between the structural and functional categories of the five disciplines. The results revealed that the number of LBs across the structural and functional categories in the five disciplines differed significantly. However, a strong association was observed between the two categories in all five disciplines where LBs incorporating noun phrases (NPs) usually performed researchoriented function whereas LBs incorporating dependent clauses (DCs) were strongly bound to text-oriented function. LBs incorporating verb phrases (VPs) on the contrary were linked to participant-oriented functions as well as other types of functions. Significant association was identified between the categories in all the disciplines. The two additional categories encompassing various structures of LBs and other functions not listed in Biber et al.’s (2004) Structural Taxonomy and Hyland’s (2008) Functional Taxonomy respectively were also significantly associated. The key finding of the study was that structural categories and discourse functions are closely interrelated.
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherUniversiti Putra Malaysia Press
dc.relation.haspartPertanika Journal of Social Sciences & Humanities
dc.relation.urihttp://www.pertanika.upm.edu.my/regular_issues.php?jtype=3&journal=JSSH-25-1-3
dc.rightsUniversiti Putra Malaysia
dc.subjectLexical bundles (LB)
dc.subjectMUET
dc.subjectReading test
dc.subjectReading text
dc.subjectStructural and functional categories
dc.titleComparing structural and functional lexical bundles in muet reading test
dc.typeJournal Article
dc.format.volume25
dc.format.pages133-148
dc.format.issue1
Appears in Collections:Journal Content Pages/ Kandungan Halaman Jurnal

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
ukmvital_84496+Source01+Source010.PDF550.57 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open
Show simple item record Recommend this item


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.