Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://ptsldigital.ukm.my/jspui/handle/123456789/578314
Title: | Bhabha’s parody of the master-slave relationship in j. m. coetzee’s foe: friday’s resistance and susan’s chicanery |
Authors: | Alireza Farahbakhsh Mohammad Chohan |
Keywords: | Ambivalence Cultural studies Stereotype Master-slave relationship Parody Resistance Subaltern |
Issue Date: | Jun-2017 |
Description: | The present paper studies John Maxwell Coetzee’s Foe (1986) from Homi K. Bhabha’s standpoint which parodies the conventional definition of master and slave. Unlike the conventional view that the slave is a passive being under the ultimate dominion of his/her master, Bhabha, by parodying the Master-Slave relationship through his concept of ‘ambivalence’, reveals that in particular moments the slave shows resistance and, thus, is an active agent. In Coetzee’s novel, Friday—Cruso’s and later Susan’s slave—through various forms of resistance, like silence and disobedience, not only abrogates all of her attempts to dominate him, but also obliges her to change her strategy of dealing with him. He, although a slave, not only refuses to communicate in any way with Susan, but also refuses to obey her commands frustrating her in every possible way. In the end, the paper concludes that the colonised—in the novel represented by Friday—is not a passive figure as pictured in various colonial sources; instead, he/she is an active figure and has a significant role in shaping the colonizer’s strategy of dealing with him/her. |
News Source: | Pertanika Journals |
ISSN: | 0128-7702 |
Volume: | 25 |
Pages: | 577-588 |
Publisher: | Universiti Putra Malaysia Press |
Appears in Collections: | Journal Content Pages/ Kandungan Halaman Jurnal |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
ukmvital_115830+Source01+Source010.PDF | 253.43 kB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.