Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ptsldigital.ukm.my/jspui/handle/123456789/577948
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorRoszilah Hamid (UKM)
dc.contributor.authorSiti Nur Eliane Suriane M.Shokri (UKM)
dc.contributor.authorShahrizan Baharom (UKM)
dc.contributor.authorNuraini Khatimin (UKM)
dc.date.accessioned2023-11-06T02:57:44Z-
dc.date.available2023-11-06T02:57:44Z-
dc.date.issued2016-04
dc.identifier.issn0128-7702
dc.identifier.otherukmvital:116621
dc.identifier.urihttps://ptsldigital.ukm.my/jspui/handle/123456789/577948-
dc.descriptionStudent performance of technical expertise at the end of the learning process is very important. The achievement of Course Outcomes (COs) must be tracked every semester and counteractive action must be carried out if the achievement does not meet the performance criteria that has been set. This paper will assess student performance for each CO for the course, Material Technology using direct and indirect assessment and triangulation as the result of continuous quality improvement (CQI). Direct assessment was measured using assignment, final examination, project presentation and laboratory report, while indirect assessment was measured using a pre-test and post-test survey. The item constructs of pretest and post-test questionnaires were validated using the Rasch measurement model. The direct and indirect assessments were compared and the results revealed that differences exist between students’ perception of their learning and their actual learning. The findings indicate that there is an inconsistency between students’ perception of their learning (indirect assessment) and their attainment of knowledge and practical skills as rated by their lecturers (direct assessment). Thus, indirect measurement alone is not a valid measure of student learning achievement.
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherUniversiti Putra Malaysia Press
dc.relation.haspartPertanika Journals
dc.relation.urihttp://www.pertanika.upm.edu.my/regular_issues.php?jtype=3&journal=JSSH-24-S-4
dc.rightsUPM
dc.subjectDirect assessment
dc.subjectIndirect assessment
dc.subjectCourse Outcomes (CO)
dc.subjectMaterial technology course
dc.titleAssessing students’ performance on material technology course through direct and indirect methods
dc.typeJournal Article
dc.format.volume24
dc.format.pages185-196
dc.format.issueSpecial Issue
Appears in Collections:Journal Content Pages/ Kandungan Halaman Jurnal

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
ukmvital_116621+Source01+Source010.PDF1.05 MBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.