Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://ptsldigital.ukm.my/jspui/handle/123456789/515537
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | Mohamad Rizal Abd Rahman, Dr. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Mohammad Moghadamfard (P62816) | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2023-10-16T08:55:47Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2023-10-16T08:55:47Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2016-03-20 | - |
dc.identifier.other | ukmvital:119790 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | https://ptsldigital.ukm.my/jspui/handle/123456789/515537 | - |
dc.description | Inefficiency of Sharia and Custom courts as two main parts of the judiciary system in Iran is one of the chief reasons which led to constitutional evolutions in 1906. The first written constitution was born due to the demand for confining the king`s power and protecting citizen`s right. Hence, the constitution recognized judicial review of administrative actions through Articles 88 and 89 in which judicial review of administrative actions is left to ordinary courts and the Supreme Court as the highest court in Iran. This was inspired from judicial review in common law system in which ordinary courts are in charge of conducting judicial review rather than specific courts. However, the new approach suffered various defects and problems as the governmental system was going to be changed from absolute monarchy to democracy, and the government after the constitutional revolution was reluctant to accept monitoring measures on its jurisdiction. However, at the ending days of Shah's regime the State Council Act was passed by the parliament in order to put more limitations on governmental power and change the system to France system of judicial review by establishing a specific body to deal with administrative actions review but this piece of enactment never came into force. After Islamic Revolution in 1979, the Administrative Justice Court Act was passed in 1982 by Parliament and the Administrative Justice Court was established subsequently to deal with judicial review of administrative actions. However, according to Article 170 Constitution of Iran, ordinary courts are also empowered to conduct judicial review but in a limited way, where they may choose not to apply regulations which are unlawful or inconsistent with Islam principles. The exact role of ordinary courts, the scope of judicial review applied by them and the issues of bodies and actions amenable to judicial review will be discussed in this research. The research will ends by proposing solutions for the betterment of the practice in Iran.,Ph.D. | - |
dc.language.iso | eng | - |
dc.publisher | UKM, Bangi | - |
dc.relation | Faculty of Law / Fakulti Undang-undang | - |
dc.rights | UKM | - |
dc.subject | Judicial review of administrative acts -- Iran | - |
dc.subject | Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia -- Dissertations | - |
dc.subject | Dissertations, Academic -- Malaysia | - |
dc.title | A critical analysis of judicial review of administrative actions in Iran: redefining the scope and grounds applied by the administrative justice court | - |
dc.type | Theses | - |
dc.format.pages | 192 | - |
dc.identifier.callno | C21.MOH 2016 2 tesis | - |
Appears in Collections: | Faculty of Law / Fakulti Undang-undang |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
ukmvital_119790+Source01+Source01.1.PDF Restricted Access | 386.5 kB | Adobe PDF | View/Open | |
ukmvital_119790+Source01+Source010.PDF Restricted Access | 1.07 MB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.