Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ptsldigital.ukm.my/jspui/handle/123456789/457423
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.advisorBadiah Baharin, Dr.-
dc.contributor.authorSiti Nurqissa binti Mustafa (P66140)-
dc.date.accessioned2023-09-12T04:06:44Z-
dc.date.available2023-09-12T04:06:44Z-
dc.date.issued2015-07-10-
dc.identifier.otherukmvital:96688-
dc.identifier.urihttps://ptsldigital.ukm.my/jspui/handle/123456789/457423-
dc.descriptionAbility to carry out the self-examination and involvement of the patients themselves in the periodontal self-examination was the main focus of the earlier study, while self-reported periodontal disease was mainly based on patients’ perceived and previous history of periodontal disease. Proven by positive results previously, the aim of this research was to compare the agreement between periodontal self-examination and self-reported periodontal disease among adult patients with the clinical examination as the gold standard. This comparative cross-sectional study had involved one hundred and seventy two patients attended Dental Polyclinic, The National University of Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur. All eligible patients randomly assigned into two groups following the Basic Periodontal Examination. Group one (SE) performed and answered the periodontal self-examination according to illustrated written instruction manual and group two (SR) received similar content of self-reported periodontal disease questionnaire. Clinical evaluation performed by single trained examiner in both groups and findings was compared. Data were analyzed using SPSS software version 22.0. In both groups, equally demonstrate for demographic data was seen for mild, moderate and severe periodontitis which constitute within the age group. Majority in both groups showed low knowledge of periodontal disease. Mean clinical attachment level 3.55 ± 0.91 (SE) and 3.51 ± 0.94 in SR group. Generally, poor agreement was observed in both groups with Kappa value less than 0.20. Item number of teeth showed very strong correlation in both groups. Good validity seen for item bleeding from gums which showed higher in sensitivity for SR compared to SE group. Gingival colour had a similar specificity in both groups with poor sensitivity seen in SE. Selected item in self-reported showed more promising results and good validity although low agreement seen.,Ijazah Sarjana Doktor Pergigian Klinikal-
dc.language.isoeng-
dc.publisherUKM, Kuala Lumpur-
dc.relationFaculty of Dentistry / Fakulti Pergigian-
dc.rightsUKM-
dc.subjectperiodontal self-examination-
dc.subjectself-reported periodontal disease-
dc.subjectDissertations, Academic -- Malaysia-
dc.titleComparision between periodontal self-examination and self-reported periodontal disease among selected adults in Kuala Lumpur-
dc.typetheses-
dc.format.pages90-
dc.identifier.callnoWU20.5.S625c 2015 9-
Appears in Collections:Faculty of Dentistry / Fakulti Pergigian

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
ukmvital_96688+Source01+Source010.PDF
  Restricted Access
363.39 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.